ABUSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND ITS INADEQUATE RECEPTION IN BRAZIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56256/themis.v22i1.1032Abstract
After the Cold War, there has been a proliferation of hybrid regimes in international politics. In these systems, roughly speaking, there is a combination of democratic rules and authoritarian practices, so that they are situated in the middle ground between full democracies and dictatorships. In this context, David Landau identifies an increasingly present phenomenon, which he calls abusive constitutionalism. This phenomenon involves the use of mechanisms of constitutional change (constitutional amendment and replacement) to weaken democracy and guide a political system to a less than democratic regime. In the legal environment, it is common for legal concepts, theories, and models produced in a given country to be “copied” by others. This is the process known as legal transplant. The reception of foreign legal models thoughtlessly by the doctrine is too risky and takes center stage in this study. From this, the problem of the present research is imposed: has the Brazilian academic production appropriately assimilated David Landau's theory of abusive constitutionalism? The methodology used to solve the issue is based prevalently on a bibliographical survey of specialized books and articles and is carried out by confronting the views of national authors with the paradigm launched by Landau. At the end, it is concluded that the Brazilian doctrine inadequately received abusive constitutionalism.